Legal Opinion
Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co. v. Vincel
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 15, 1983No. 2-682A190PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Plaintiff-Appellant Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company (Lumbermens) appeals from a Declaratory Judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Arthur and Joseph Vincel (Vincels), claiming the trial court erred in extending the uninsured motorist provisions of Lumbermens's automobile insurance policy to include Joseph, a resident relative of the named insured Arthur, who owned his own uninsured private automobile and was a pedestrian when injured.
We reverse.
FACTS
The undisputed facts reveal that Joseph Vincel (Joseph), the son of Arthur F. Vincel (Arthur),…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Farmers Insurance v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Cincinnati Insurance v. MallonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Lewis v. American Family Insurace GroupKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
- Ely v. State Farm Ins.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Patton v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. BolesIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Middlesex Insurance v. QuinnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connell v. American Underwriters, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Gormbard v. Zurich InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.