Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City v. Acosta

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 11, 1971No. 44912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice:

Petitioner, City of Oklahoma City, respondent below, seeks review of an award of the State Industrial Court allowing the respondent, Anastacio M. Acosta, Jr., claimant below, twenty per cent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole for injuries sustained while employed and working as a laborer for Oklahoma City. The parties will be referred to as they appeared before the State Industrial Court, hereinafter referred to as the “trial court”.

On April 26, 1970, claimant was employed by respondent city at its Fairgrounds Arena as a laborer. He was assisting in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Drumbight Feed Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Cooper v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. BOARD OF EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST NO. 1, TULSA v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. City of Tulsa v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  5. Woods v. PerrymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tulsa Linen Service Company v. KrothSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API