Legal Opinion
Tulsa Linen Service Company v. Kroth
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 6, 1973No. 45665PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice:
Petitioner seeks review of an en banc order, affirming a trial judge’s order, awarding temporary total compensation and medical expenses for an accidental injury received by claimant (respondent) in the course of his employment. Three issues are urged as grounds for vacating this order: (1) claimant was not engaged in hazardous employment within purview of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (85 O.S. 1971 § 1 et seq.); (2) alleged injury was not sustained while in petitioner’s employment; and (3) award entered requires payment of unauthorized medical expenses.
Claimant, a 19 year old…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson Co., Inc. v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Pemberton Bakery v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Petroleum Chemical Corp. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Baldwin-Hill Company v. LochnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Quality Materials Company v. PayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Pearl v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Goombi v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Iwunoh v. Maremont Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Burns v. Southwestern Preferred Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.