Legal Opinion

Hartig v. Stratman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2000No. 82A01-9910-CV-336PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Chief Judge

This case comes to us on interlocutory appeal. Timothy Hartig appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for summary judgment. Hartig raises three issues, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment. We raise one issue sua sponte: whether Har-tig’s motion for summary judgment requested the resolution of less than all the issues or claims involved. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

The relevant facts follow. Melvin and Louise Stratman are the owners of real…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jordan v. DeeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Trotter v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Keybank National Ass'n v. NBD BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Cohoon v. FisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Platt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. NallyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hartig v. StratmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Bank of New York v. NallyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. James T. Mitchell v. 10th and the Bypass, LLC, and Elway, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Jones v. NicholsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API