Legal Opinion
Hedges v. . H.R.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 16, 1872PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The defendant remained liable as common carrier of the paper until the plaintiffs had a reasonable time to remove it, after notice of its arrival at the depot in New York city. (Fenner v.Buff. and St. Line R.R. Co., 44 N.Y., 505.) What is such reasonable time is, when there is no dispute as to the facts, a question of law for the court. (Roth v. Buff. and St. L.R.R.Co., 34 N.Y., 548.)
We do not perceive that there is here any dispute as to the material facts. It…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Roth v. . Buffalo State Line R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Fenner v. . Buffalo and State Line R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
3Cited by8 opinions
- Graves v. Fitchburg RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- In Re Twenty-One Slot MacHines, Etc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Leech v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
- King v. New Brunswick, Amboy & New York Steamboat Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1901
- Kressin v. Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.