Legal Opinion
In Re Twenty-One Slot MacHines, Etc.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1951No. 5314PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
72 Ariz. 408 (1951)
236 P.2d 733
In re TWENTY-ONE SLOT MACHINES, etc.
TUCSON PRESS CLUB et al.
v.
EYMAN.
No. 5314.
Supreme Court of Arizona.
October 15, 1951.
E.T. Cusick and Richard H. Chambers, Tucson, for appellants.
Fred O. Wilson, Atty. Gen., Maurice Barth, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Robert Morrison, County Atty. of Pima County, Tucson, for appellee.
David H. Palmer, Jr., County Atty. of Yavapai County, Prescott, amicus curiae.
GIBBONS, Superior Court Judge.
This is an appeal from judgments and orders of the superior court of Pima County decreeing certain slot machines property illegal per se, directing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re LewkowitzArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Arizona Land & Stock Co. v. MarkusArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- In Re Hull Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re LewkowitzArizona Supreme Court · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Police Pension Board of City of Phoenix v. WarrenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Clovis National Bank v. CallawayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- State v. Clifton Lodge No. 1174, Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Police Pension Board of City of Phoenix v. WarrenArizona Supreme Court · 1965