Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Luminar Technologies, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided December 12, 2024No. 6:23-cv-00982Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION JOHN ALMS, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:23-cv-982-JSS-LHP LUMINAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., MIKE MCAULIFFE, AUSTIN RUSSELL, and JASON EICHENHOLZ, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Class Action Complaint with prejudice. (Motion, Dkt. 66). Plaintiff opposes the Motion. (Dkt. 68.) Upon consideration, the Motion is granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND Defendant Luminar Technologies, Inc. (Luminar) is a publicly traded company that develops technology…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API