Legal Opinion

Neale v. Sterling

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1931No. Docket No. 7986PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Shortly prior to January 12, 1926, plaintiff, a woman seventy-five years of age, had certain dealings with defendants as the result of which she transferred to the defendant Sterling Corporation certain cash, bonds and other property in exchange for stock in said corporation. On January 12, 1926, she was adjudged an incompetent person and Walter F. Kogler was appointed as her guardian. Following the appointment, plaintiff, through her guardian, offered to restore the stock received upon condition that defendants return the money and property received from her. Upon defendants’ failure to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McNeese v. McNeeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Maionchi v. NicholiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Volk v. VolkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hernandez v. BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Burgess v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Stratton v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Weseman v. LathamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API