Legal Opinion

Isaacson v. Isaacson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 2010No. 20090114PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Erik Isaacson has attempted to appeal from the district court’s Memorandum Opinion, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order for Judgment establishing visitation, child support, division of marital property and spousal support. Generally, orders and memorandum opinions are not appealable. Zueger v. Carlson, 542 N.W.2d 92, 94 n. 2 (N.D.1996). However, “because there is a subsequently entered consistent judgment, we consider the appeal to be from the subsequently entered consistent final judgment.” Christian v. Christian, 2007 ND 196, ¶ 5, 742 N.W.2d 819. Erik…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Heggen v. HeggenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Dronen v. DronenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Selzler v. SelzlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Fuhrman v. FuhrmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. St. Claire v. St. ClaireNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Hammeren v. HammerenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Lund v. LundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Lechler v. LechlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Wilson v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API