Legal Opinion
Ritter v. State
New York Court of Claims
Decided May 21, 1953No. Motion No. 2350PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSylvester, J.
This motion for leave to file a claim against the State, pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act is opposed on the ground that the proposed claim fails to state a cause of action which contention, if sustained, requires a denial of the application (Siegel v. State of New York, 262 App. Div. 388; Toyos v. State of New York, 181 Misc. 761; Young v. State of New York, 190 Misc. 711). The proposed claim and affidavit allege that on June 2, 1949, claimant, a practicing dentist, was held up and robbed of various articles of property, including a diamond and sapphire ring,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Bernardine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ritter v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Peterson v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1962
- Mentillo v. City of AuburnNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Napolitano v. Town of ChiliNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Levy v. SalernoNew York Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.