Legal Opinion
City of St. Petersburg v. Cashman
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 9, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEBRING, Justice.
This is a certiorari proceeding wherein the' City of St: Petersburg, seeks the review of an order of the -Florida Industrial Commission which overruled an order of a deputy commissioner and awarded workmen’s compensátion to the claimant, Myrtle Cash-man.
• There is no real dispute about the material facts in the case. The City of St. Petersburg owns the Mound Park Hospital ' and operates a cafeteria in the building. The claimant, Myrtle Cashman, went to the hospital to secure employment.- The head dietitian offered her a job as a cafeteria counter girl and told her to report…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fidelity Casualty Co. of New York v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Sweat v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Williams v. BedenbaughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Kasari v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Benoit Coal Mining Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Artukovich v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Doctor's Business Service, Inc. v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. AkinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Perez v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Koch v. Berkey Film Processing, Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.