Legal Opinion
State v. Day
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 11, 1987No. M84-1158; CA A39279PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Defendant appeals her conviction for driving while suspended, contending that the statute under which her driver’s license was suspended is unconstitutional under the Oregon Constitution. She was found to have violated ORS 471.430, which prohibits persons under 21 years of age from possessing alcohol. Because she was 17 years old, 1 her driver’s license was suspended pursuant to former ORS 482.593(1), 2 which provided:
“Whenever a person who is 17 years of age or younger, but not younger than 13 years of age, is convicted of any offense described in this subsection or determined by a juvenile…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Olsen v. State Ex Rel. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. FreelandOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Hewitt v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Brown v. Portland School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Brown v. Portland School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Johnson v. State Hearing Examiner's OfficeWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. ZinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- State v. BennettIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Guard Publishing Co. v. Lane County School District No. 4JCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Harrington v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.