Legal Opinion
State v. Crims
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 28, 1995No. C6-95-41, C1-95-304PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
A jury convicted Raymond Crims of third-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.344, subd. 1(c). On appeal, Crims argues he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court committed plain error when instructing the jury, violated his constitutional rights by excluding evidence of the victim’s history as a prostitute, and abused its discretion by refusing to grant a new trial due to juror misconduct.
*863FACTS
On December 2, 1993, Raymond Crims met T.K. at Danny’s Bar. For three to four hours, the two played pool, danced, hugged, and kissed. Shortly…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. PulizzanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. BunyardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. BabyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- State v. CrainNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1997
- Williams v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.