Key v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1Dissent
I concur with most of the discussion in the main opinion, and I concur to affirm the judgment.
However, I write specially to express my agreement with the State's arguments (1) that, by enacting the Alabama Criminal Code, the Legislature intended to supersede the common-law year-and-a-day rule and (2) that even if it did not, this Court has the authority to abolish the application of the common-law rule without running afoul of the separation-of-powers doctrine in Alabama. See Art. III, §§ 42 and 43, Ala. Const. 1901.
Section 1-3-1, Ala. Code 1975, provides:
"The common law of England, so far as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Swartz v. United States Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. GuytonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Harkness v. SearsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
- Tucker v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964