Swartz v. United States Steel Corporation
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
*441HARWOOD, Justice.
In the proceedings below Mrs. Edna M. Swartz filed a suit against the United States Steel Corporation seeking damages for the loss of her husband’s consortium because of injuries resulting proximately from the alleged negligence of the Steel Company.
The trial court, on motion of the Steel Company, dismissed the plaintiff’s suit, as it was bound to do under the decision of this court in Smith v. United Construction Workers, 271 Ala. 42, 122 So.2d 153 (1960), wherein it was held that a wife has no cause of action under the common law of Alabama for the loss of her husband’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Millington v. Southeastern Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- American Export Lines, Inc. v. AlvezSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Ex Parte KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Brown v. MetzgerIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Mattison v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.