Legal Opinion
State v. Council in the Division of Resource Development of the Department of Conservation
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 22, 1972PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
This case involves a tidelands issue. A motion was made for a pretrial ruling upon the meaning of a portion of our opinion in O’Neill v. State Highway Department, 50 N. J. 307 (1967), for guidance in preparation for trial. Under the unusual circumstances in this area of litigation, a pretrial motion of that kind was appropriate. The trial court entered an order and the Attorney General was granted leave to appeal hy the Appellate Division. We certified the matter before argument there.
The pertinent portion of the O’Neill opinion reads, 50 N. J. at 326-327:
The proofs suggest…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- O'Neill v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Interchemical Corp. v. Uncas Printing & Fin. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Goldstein v. Continental Baking Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rosenblit v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Torres v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Beers v. Bayliner Marine Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Anderson v. LitzenbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Wajda v. KingsburyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.