Wajda v. Kingsbury
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge. *
This action arose out of a collision between a police squad car and a tow truck. An issue at trial was whether the squad car’s siren had been activated. The jury returned a verdict for the tow truck operator, and the district court denied appellants’ motion for new trial. Appellants contend that the district court erroneously instructed the jury that it could make an adverse inference from appellants’ failure to produce a tape that might have corroborated evidence as to the siren because (1) no evidence that has been shown to exist has been destroyed; (2) there…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vernon Ervin Dillon, Jr. Louise Dillon v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Litchfield Precision Components, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Rogers v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Anderson v. LitzenbergCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. EngesserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Yath v. Fairview Clinics, N. P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Miller v. LankowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Foust v. McFairlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Gray v. Comm'r of Pub. SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.