Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Glenny

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 7, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an action in equity brought by a customer against his brokers for the rescission of a contract of sale of stock. Plaintiff instructed defendants to buy 500 shares of stock at “ 35J or better.” Defendants at once purchased the specified stock of the issuing house which promptly confirmed the sale to the brokers at thirty-five and one-half “ less one point concession to you ” ($500), upon condition that the amount of the concession be paid back in case any of the stock so sold should be repurchased in the open market at or below thirty-five and one-half per share within sixty days.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Little v. PhippsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Roche v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Knapp v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. McMillan v. . ArthurNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE PLAYERS ASSOC. v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
  2. Connelly v. GlennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Howell, MacArthur & Wiggin, Inc. v. WeinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Kinney v. LismanNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Kinney v. LismanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API