Legal Opinion

Kundrat v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 24, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-2085 RMUPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Granting Unopposed Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint; Granting the Superior Court Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This Title VII discrimination, and retaliation case comes before the court upon the plaintiffs unopposed motion for leave to amend the complaint and the two original defendants’ motion to dismiss. The two parties named as defendants in the original complaint, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia and the Joint Committee on Judicial Administration (collectively “the Superior Court” or “the Superi- or Court…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Jacqueline P. Taylor v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Ricki Helfer, Chairman, FdicCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  5. Blackmar v. GuerreSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Sibley v. U.S. Supreme CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. Melton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  3. Owens v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. United States Ex Rel. Davis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. Fraternal Order of Police/Metropolitan Police Department Labor CommitteeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API