Legal Opinion

Taber v. Niagara Frontier Transit Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1979PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*93OPINION OF THE COURT

Rudolph U. Johnson, J.

Defendants, Niagara Frontier Transit Metro Systems, Inc. (NFT Metro), sued herein as Niagara Frontier Transit Authority, and John Chudzinski, by notice of motion seek an order pursuant to CPLR 3211 dismissing the complaint of the plaintiffs, Angeline and Curtis G. Taber, on the ground that the plaintiffs’ cause of action is barred by the Statute of Limitations as expressed in subdivision 2 of section 1299-p of the Public Authorities Law.

The underlying cause of action arises from a claim for personal injuries allegedly suffered by plaintiff, Angeline…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barchet v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Niemczyk v. PawlakNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Parry v. ScottNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Corrello v. CostelloNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Kraeger v. South Lewis Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re TerritoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  2. Albano v. HawkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Territo (In Re Territo)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1983
  4. Gagliardi v. FlackMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Gersten v. American Transit InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API