Legal Opinion
State v. Hinshaw
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 16, 2009No. 26900-1-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
205 P.3d 178 (2009)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Roger HINSHAW, Petitioner.
No. 26900-1-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
April 16, 2009.
David L. Donnan, Gregory Charles Link, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
D. Angus Lee, Grant County Prosecuting Attorney, Ephrata, WA, for Respondent.
SCHULTHEIS, C.J.
¶ 1 A warrantless entry inside a home is presumptively unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution. Absent exigent circumstances that threshold may not reasonably be…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tamisha Pearson v. City Of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State of Washington v. Eric Daniel CruzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Troy C. RestvedtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State of Washington v. Eric Daniel CruzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.