Legal Opinion

State of Washington v. Eric Daniel Cruz

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 19, 2016No. 33312-4-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals September 22, 2016.]

Pennell, J.

¶1 Law enforcement need not obtain a warrant prior to conducting a protective vehicle search, so long as there is reasonable suspicion a suspect is dangerous and may gain immediate control of weapons. We are confronted with whether a suspect’s potential access to firearms alone satisfies these prerequisites. Under the circumstances presented here, involving a recreational sportsman cited for a fishing violation, we hold it does not. We thus affirm the superior court’s order of suppression.

FACTS

¶2 Late one August…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Harold B. Dorman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  5. State v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State Of Washington v. William R. PippinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. State Of Washington, Resp/x-app v. David Zachery Morgan, App/x-respCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. State of Washington v. Leno Sabalsa HowardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2025
  5. State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API