State of Washington v. Eric Daniel Cruz
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals September 22, 2016.]
Pennell, J.
¶1 Law enforcement need not obtain a warrant prior to conducting a protective vehicle search, so long as there is reasonable suspicion a suspect is dangerous and may gain immediate control of weapons. We are confronted with whether a suspect’s potential access to firearms alone satisfies these prerequisites. Under the circumstances presented here, involving a recreational sportsman cited for a fishing violation, we hold it does not. We thus affirm the superior court’s order of suppression.
FACTS
¶2 Late one August…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Harold B. Dorman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- State v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- State Of Washington v. William R. PippinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- State Of Washington, Resp/x-app v. David Zachery Morgan, App/x-respCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- State of Washington v. Leno Sabalsa HowardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2025
- State v. CruzWashington Supreme Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.