Legal Opinion
Hudson Riverkeeper Fund, Inc. v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 21, 1993No. 93 Civ. 3116(CLB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
BRIEANT, District Judge.
Defendant Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc. (“0 & R”), seeks summary judgment dismissing the Amended Complaint (“Complaint”) in this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and failure to join the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“DEC”) as issuer of a State Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“SPDES”) permit held by defendant, as a necessary party to this action.
Parties
Plaintiff, Hudson Riverkeeper Fund, Inc., (“Riverkeeper”) is a New York not-for-profit…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sierra Club v. Young Life Campaign, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2001
- Cronin v. BrownerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Seneca Lake Guardian v. Greenidge Generation LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023