Legal Opinion

Buraczynski v. Eyring

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1996PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

In this consolidated appeal, we are asked to decide whether an agreement between a physician and a patient to submit to arbitration “any existing or thereafter arising controversy” is applicable to a medical malpractice dispute and enforceable under the Tennessee Arbitration Act.

The trial court denied the physician’s motions to compel arbitration in each of two separate medical malpractice actions on the grounds that the agreements were not subject to the arbitration statute, and that the agreements were not enforceable contracts because they lacked…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Broemmer v. Abortion Services of Phoenix, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Olson v. MolzenTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Beynon v. Garden Grove Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Leong Ex Rel. Leong v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsHawaii Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Rivera v. Centro Medico De Turabo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. Tonya Cooper v. Mrm Investment Company, Terry Rogers and Larry MaysCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Seawright v. American General Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Genesis HealthcareWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Wallace v. National Bank of CommerceTennessee Supreme Court · 1997

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API