Legal Opinion

Neisius v. Henry

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1943No. 31394PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is a taxpayer’s suit to recover a judgment against one Henry and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, his bondsman, for money paid Henry in excess of his statutory salary as chairman of the board of public works of the city of Fremont, a city of the first class. The case was previously heard by this court and an opinion written, Neisius v. Henry, 142 Neb. 29, 5 N. W. (2d) 291. In that opinion the court held that the applicable statute of limitations was ten years as provided in section 20-2Ó9, Comp. St. 1929. The correctness of this holding was challenged by *274the motions for a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neisius v. HenryNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Fox v. MeachamNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Kane v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Turner, Frazer & Co. v. KillianNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  5. State ex rel. Paulsen v. McKaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stacey v. PantanoNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Arthur Ex Rel. City of Beatrice v. TrindelNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. County of Platte v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1946
  4. Stock v. MeissnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Riddlestorffer v. RahwayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API