Legal Opinion

Hills, Mary v. Essentia Health

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 23, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00907Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MARY HILLS, individually and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. 19-cv-907-wmc ESSENTIA HEALTH, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff, v. CIOX HEALTH, LLC, Third-Party Defendant. Following complaints of price gouging, the Wisconsin Legislature placed caps on certain fees that a health care provider may charge for providing copies of a patient’s health care records. At issue in this case in particular, Wisconsin law prohibits a health care provider from charging a “retrieval” or…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API