Clayton v. Steve-Cathey, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jordan, Judge.
The defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this case was predicated upon the alleged failure of the plaintiff to use ordinary care for her own safety in walking upon the floor on which she fell. It is the contention of the defendant that since the plaintiff’s deposition disclosed that she had observed that said floor “looked slippery, shiny and highly polished,” a finding was demanded for the defendant on this issue and the trial court therefore did not err in sustaining its motion.
The plaintiff maintains, however, that since “knowledge of defects” is not necessarily…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Scott v. Rich's Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Goldsmith v. HazelwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Townley v. Rich's Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Rothschild v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Beck v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Durrett v. TunnoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Yale & Towne, Inc. v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Pippins v. BremanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Burns v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- American National Bank v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.