Bouley v. City of Norwich
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1DissentBerdon, J.
I agree with the Appellate Court that the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act; General Statutes (Rev. to 1985) § 31-284;1 does not bar an employee injured in an automobile accident while in the course of his employment from receiving uninsured motorist benefits2 from his self-insured employer. Any other result would simply confuse tort law with contract law—both of which, of course, are birds of a different feather.
The majority claims that the Appellate Court’s decision was predicated, in part, on a misreading of Wilson v. Security Ins. Co., 213 Conn. 532, 569 A.2d 40,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Christy v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
- William v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
- Boris v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.