Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bouley v. City of Norwich

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 18, 1992No. 14356Published

1DissentBerdon, J.

I agree with the Appellate Court that the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act; General Statutes (Rev. to 1985) § 31-284;1 does not bar an employee injured in an automobile accident while in the course of his employment from receiving uninsured motorist benefits2 from his self-insured employer. Any other result would simply confuse tort law with contract law—both of which, of course, are birds of a different feather.

The majority claims that the Appellate Court’s decision was predicated, in part, on a misreading of Wilson v. Security Ins. Co., 213 Conn. 532, 569 A.2d 40,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Harvey v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Christy v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  4. William v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  5. Boris v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API