Willcott v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Kaul, J.:
Plaintiff-appellant, a retail liquor dealer, licensed under the Kansas Liquor Control Act (K. S. A. 41-101, et seq.), instituted this action to obtain a declaratory judgment determining the validity of a memorandum issued by the State Director of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
The controversy concerns the sale of beer as an alcoholic beverage, defined in K. S. A. 41-102 (now 1969 Supp.), as distinguished from a cereal malt beverage (K. S. A. 41-2701 [e]).
On March 31, 1966, the Director of Alcoholic Beverage Control (hereafter referred to as the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. Columbia Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- State v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- State v. SumnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Chambers v. HerrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Woods v. Midwest Conveyor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Amoco Production Co. v. Armold, Director of TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
- Rhodes v. HarderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Cray v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Kansas Human Rights Commission v. Topeka Golf Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.