Legal Opinion

Willcott v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1970No. 45,540PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

Plaintiff-appellant, a retail liquor dealer, licensed under the Kansas Liquor Control Act (K. S. A. 41-101, et seq.), instituted this action to obtain a declaratory judgment determining the validity of a memorandum issued by the State Director of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

The controversy concerns the sale of beer as an alcoholic beverage, defined in K. S. A. 41-102 (now 1969 Supp.), as distinguished from a cereal malt beverage (K. S. A. 41-2701 [e]).

On March 31, 1966, the Director of Alcoholic Beverage Control (hereafter referred to as the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. Columbia Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. State v. LoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. State v. SumnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  4. State v. PayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Chambers v. HerrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Woods v. Midwest Conveyor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Armold, Director of TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Rhodes v. HarderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Cray v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. Kansas Human Rights Commission v. Topeka Golf Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API