Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. Columbia Pictures Corp.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 27, 1966No. 44,618PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

The Kansas Motion Picture Censorship Act makes it unlawful for any person to sell, lease, exhibit or use any motion picture film in this state unless the film has been submitted to ánd received a prior certificate of approval from the Kansas State Board of Review, and it imposes criminal sanctions on any person who violates the Act. (K. S. A. 51-101-112; 74-2201-2209.)

On October 5, 1965, Columbia Pictures Corporation informed the Kansas Board of Review that henceforth it would submit no further films intended for exhibition or distribution…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. A Quantity of Copies of Books v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Employment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Woods v. Midwest Conveyor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Kansas Department of Revenue v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. Cities Service Gas Co. v. State Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Carpenter v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. Kansas Public Service Co. v. State Corporation Comm.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API