Legal Opinion

Hord v. Bodley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 15, 1824PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Mason Circuit Court, the Hon. Adam Beatty sole Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*88Opinion of the Court,

by Judge Owsley.

THIS ejectment was brought by Hprd against Bodley in the court below, and was served upon the tenants in possession on the 12th of August, 1817.

Although the elder patentee, in coníawPlmust be adjudged to be possessed the lan?’ „¡or patentee had an autua,ie®^emeni: ,v¡X0°ut being actually oust®d,^the tee may1 elect to be disseizetI> for ,he °f under which the expdkscl. The act of 1 t0 com‘ pel the ’usta<*"f iancTclaims does not vary the law.

*89Each party claims the land in contest under adverse interfering patents. The patent under which Bodley claims, is…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harrison v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834
  2. Cottle v. SydnorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1847
  3. McGowan v. CrooksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
  4. Smith's Heirs v. Frost'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1834
  5. Combs v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API