Legal Opinion
Barber v. George R. Jones Shoe Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 2, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, J.
Upon the case presented, the plaintiff takes nothing by her alleged bill of exceptions. After the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action and for judgment had been granted, and the plaintiff had claimed an exception, the court ordered a bill of exceptions to be filed by December 5, 1921. Thereupon plaintiff’s counsel stated that they did not care to except, but would submit to the ruling of the court. December 28, 1921, the plaintiff filed a motion to set the verdict aside as against the law and because the procedure was improper, and for a new trial. The motion was denied because all…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Telegram Newspaper Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Galland v. GallandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Goodhart v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- State v. HowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Campbell v. Justices of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Keenan v. FearonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Calderwood v. CalderwoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Stephenson v. StephensonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- Indian Head National Bank v. CoreySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Roussin v. Johnson (In Re Roussin)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.