Legal Opinion

Roussin v. Johnson (In Re Roussin)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided August 25, 1988No. 19-10163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JAMES E. YACOS, Bankruptcy Judge.

This chapter 7 case is presently before the court upon the plaintiff’s Complaint for Injunction, which requests that the defendant, Michael Johnson, Esquire, the Merrimack County Attorney for the State of New Hampshire, be permanently enjoined from prosecuting the plaintiff on a citation for criminal contempt. The defendant has filed an Answer, and both parties have filed trial memoranda.

The issue in this adversary proceeding is whether the state proceeding is a legitimate criminal contempt proceeding to protect the state court’s authority…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roussin v. Johnson (In Re Roussin)District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1989
  2. In Re McMullenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
  3. Adie v. Adie (In Re Adie)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996
  4. Erickson v. District Court of the State of Colorado (In Re Erickson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API