Legal Opinion

Vinson v. Hamilton

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1993No. S-4857Published

1Opinion of the Court

854 P.2d 733 (1993)

Jack VINSON, Petitioner,

v.

Robert J. HAMILTON, Respondent.

No. S-4857.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

June 11, 1993.

Rehearing Denied July 23, 1993.

Barbara J. Hood and Carol Daniel, Alaska Legal Services Corp., and Richard F. Illgen, Preston Thorgrimson Shidler Gates & Ellis, Anchorage, for petitioner.

Albert Maffei, Anchorage, for respondent.

Before MOORE, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, BURKE, MATTHEWS and COMPTON, JJ.

OPINION

MOORE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Jack Vinson appeals a decision of the superior court affirming the district court's judgment against him in a proceeding for forcible…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Pernell v. Southall RealtySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. BombolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  5. State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API