Legal Opinion

Universal Credit Co. v. Blinderman

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 7, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

In an action brought in this court to foreclose a lien on chattel plaintiff issued a warrant of seizure commanding a marshal of the city of New York to seize a certain automobile sold to the defendant Blinderman under a conditional sales contract. The marshal seized the vehicle and served upon the garage owner, in whose possession the vehicle was found, the warrant of seizure and accompanying papers, as well as the summons in the action. The service of these papers is said to have been made in compliance with sections 60 and 71 of the Municipal Court Code which authorize service upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shaul v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Straus v. GuilhouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Olesen v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clare v. GuidiNew York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API