Hockersmith v. City of Patagonia
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHMOND, Chief Judge.
Lilburn O. Hockersmith, former deputy marshal for the City of Patagonia, filed suit against the city for overtime wages under A.R.S. § 23-392. After trial to the court without a jury, he was awarded nominal damages of $1.00. The court found Hockersmith was entitled to overtime compensation for hours actually worked in excess of 40 hours per week, but that he had failed to establish how many such hours he actually worked and what his regular hourly rate of < pay might have been. We affirm the judgment.
A.R.S. § 23-392 mandates compensation to any person engaged in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rural Fire Protection Company, a Corporation v. William E. HeppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Crago v. Rockwell Manufacturing Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Perry v. George P. Livermore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Prendergast v. City of TempeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Patton v. County of MohaveCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021