Legal Opinion

Been v. the Lummus Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 2, 1946No. Civ. 15301PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

The question for decision is whether there was substantial evidentiary support for verdicts returned in favor of appellants for damages in their joint action for personal injuries, the trial court having entered judgment for respondent non obstante veredicto. Verdicts having been returned in favor of all the defendants except The Lummus Company, it moved for judgments notwithstanding the verdicts. Its motion having been granted plaintiffs appeal.

Appellants were employees of Richfield Oil Company, herein referred to as Richfield, at its plant near Wilmington. The area covered by the plant…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Union Traction Co. v. BerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Comstock v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Johnson v. NicholsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Johnston v. OrlandoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Arthur v. Santa Monica Dairy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API