William D. ROPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEABODY COAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
William Roper appeals from the district court’s judgment, following trial, in favor of the defendant, Peabody Coal Company. The district court found that Mr. Roper failed to establish a prima facie case on his claim that his discharge from employment by Peabody violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm the district court’s judgment.
The district court found, with sufficient evidentiary support, that Mr. Roper was discharged as part of an ongoing reduction in force. Mr. Roper had no…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Martin Rabinovitz v. Honorable Federico Pena, Secretary of Transportation, United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Carole M. HARTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WISCONSIN BELL, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Roger COLLIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the BUDD COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- James O'COnnOr v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corporation, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.