Legal Opinion
Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. Asia
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided March 12, 1921No. 236PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The rights for all parties to this proceeding are fixed and limited by the provisions of sections 8005-8008, *488Rem. & Bal. Code of Wash. Section 8005 authorizes the acquiring of a public utility. Section 8006 provides the method of procedure when it is deemed advisable to purchase any public utility mentioned in 8005, and if in the acquisition a general indebtedness is to be incurred: “Such proposition shall be adopted and assented to by three-fifths of the qualified voters of the said city or. town voting at said election.” Such proceedings were had by the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Lake Street Elevated RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chicot County v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Metropolitan Life Ins. v. SchneiderDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940