Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Schneider
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 19, 1940No. Civ. A. No. 967PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, District Judge.
On June 16, 1922 and December 24, 1926 plaintiff issued policies of insurance on the life of the defendant Simon Schneider in the sum of $5,000 and $20,000 respectively, both of which designated the co-defendant, Rae H. Schneider, wife of the insured, beneficiary. By the terms of a supplemental agreement attached to and a par.t of each policy, the plaintiff contracted to pay the insured certain fixed money benefits in the event the insured became totally and permanently disabled before he attained the age of sixty years.' In the application for each policy the insured…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Ins.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1941
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. SaftlasDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941