Cantara v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
This is an action of tort seeking recovery for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while she was a passenger on a bus owned and operated by the defendant (MBTA). The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff.
The defendant raises three contentions by its bill of exceptions. 1 It argues that the trial judge erred in denying the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the evidence, first because there was insufficient evidence to warrant a finding of negligence, and second, because there was a fatal variance between the pleadings and the proof. The third…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Yuncke v. WelkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
- Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Shepard v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Work v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. PerkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- St. Clair v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Cook v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Bosworth v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- B & M Siding Corp. v. SucuMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
- B&M Siding Corp. v. SucuMassachusetts District Court · 1982