Legal Opinion

Cantara v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided February 21, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action of tort seeking recovery for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff while she was a passenger on a bus owned and operated by the defendant (MBTA). The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff.

The defendant raises three contentions by its bill of exceptions. 1 It argues that the trial judge erred in denying the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the conclusion of the evidence, first because there was insufficient evidence to warrant a finding of negligence, and second, because there was a fatal variance between the pleadings and the proof. The third…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Yuncke v. WelkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Shepard v. HarrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Work v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. PerkersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. St. Clair v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
  2. Cook v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  3. Bosworth v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  4. B & M Siding Corp. v. SucuMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
  5. B&M Siding Corp. v. SucuMassachusetts District Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API