Legal Opinion
United States v. De Sapio
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 16, 1969No. 68 Cr. 1012PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge.
Defendants De Sapio, Corallo and Fried are charged with violations of law in a four-count indictment. Count 1 charges a conspiracy by the defendants and Itkin and Marcus, named as coconspirators but not as defendants, to obstruct commerce and affect movement in commerce by extortion (18 U.S.C. § 1951), to use facilities in interstate commerce with intent to carry on the unlawful activity of bribery (18 U.S.C. § 1952), and to use the mails to defraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341). Counts 2, 3 and 4 charge the defendants with substantive violations of § 1952.
Each of the defendants…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Joseph E. Cafero A/K/A Ernie, in No. 72-1577 Appeal of Dominick Vinciguerra, A/K/A Dom, in No. 72-1578Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Jean Robert MoriCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. NaderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Alvin E. Young, Appeal of Robert GreenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.