Legal Opinion
Reynolds Metals Co. v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided March 26, 1996No. Civil LR-C-95-281PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
EISELE, District Judge.
Before the Court is Arkansas Power & Light Company’s (AP & L’s) Motion to Dismiss, filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Reynolds Metals Company (Reynolds) has responded to this motion, opposing the relief sought. For the reasons expressed in the following opinion, AP & L’s motion will be granted.
I
Reynolds’ Complaint (Docket No. 1) asserts two independent causes of action against AP & L under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601 to 9675. First,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- SC Holdings, Inc. v. A.A.A. Realty Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Clear Lake Properties v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1997
- Stearns & Foster Bedding Co. v. Franklin Holding Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- United States v. Vertac Chemical Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1997
- Adhesives Research Inc. v. American Inks & Coatings Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996