Legal Opinion
Pressure Science, Inc. v. Kramer
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 15, 1976No. Civ. 15932PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
ZAMPANO, District Judge.
In this diversity action grounded primarily on a claim of misappropriation of trade secrets, the plaintiff, Pressure Science, Incorporated (“Pressure Science”) seeks injunctive relief and damages against-David Kramer, a former employee of Pressure Science, and Kramer’s present employer, The Advanced Products Company (“Advanced Products”).
The complaint contains three counts: two set forth causes of action for unfair competition against Kramer and Advanced Products and the third is based on a theory of unjust enrichment against Kramer alone. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- E. W. Bliss Company v. Struthers-Dunn, Inc., P. G. Bartlett, L. K. Clark, D. E. Henry and J. A. DingesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Town & Country House & Homes Service, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Keystone Plastics, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. C & P Plastics, Inc., Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Allen Manufacturing Co. v. LoikaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Electro-Craft Corp. v. Controlled Motion, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Jostens, Inc. v. National Computer System, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
- Dynamics Research Corp. v. Analytic Sciences Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Advance Biofactures Corp. v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.