Legal Opinion

Mark Houmis v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 5, 1977No. 76-1333PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAYTON, Senior District Judge:

This is an appeal from the denial by the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania of a petition to vacate a sentence.

On September 26, 1973, Mark Houmis pled not guilty to a seven-count indictment charging counterfeiting in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 471-72.

On December 4, 1973, Houmis decided to change his plea to guilty on Count II of the indictment and a hearing was held pursuant to Rule 11, F.R.Cr.P. Sentencing was postponed until January 11,1974, at which time Houmis was sentenced to a term of 8 years, 5 years of which were to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Michael Joseph Paradiso and Anthony Richard Bonnacci v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Edward F. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Victor McKeever v. Warden Sci-Graterford Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania District Attorney, Erie CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. GentileDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
  3. Randle v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. United States v. DeantoniDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  5. Mark Houmis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API