Randle v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
On August 5, 2011, Jermaine Randle filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 seeking to vacate or set aside his sentence based on Sixth Amendments claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because I find that Randle’s counsel at the time of the Change of Plea and Sentencing hearing (“primary coun*343sel”) was ineffective when she failed to object to, move to withdraw or appeal his illegal sentence under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(C), I will grant his § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence and guilty plea.
I. BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pelzer v. Superintendent Lawrence Mahally & Pa Attorney Gen.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Hopersberger v. Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- VILLAR v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024