Legal Opinion
Goldsmith v. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 26, 1983No. Civ. A. 81-275PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAPLETON, District Judge:
Plaintiff, John A. Goldsmith, here charges his former employer, E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. (“du Pont”) with unlawful employment discrimination. Goldsmith, who is black, alleges that du Pont retaliated against him for filing complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“the EEOC”) and with the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“the OFCCP”). Such retaliation would concededly violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3, and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981. The following constitutes…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cohen v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Ferguson v. EI duPont De Nemours and Co., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
- Scott v. University of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
3Cited by7 opinions
- McNeil Pharmaceutical v. HawkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Hurley v. Atlantic City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Shepherd v. Hunterdon Dev. Ctr.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Cuffy v. Texaco Refining & Marketing Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- Cooper v. City of North OlmstedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.