Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. EI duPont De Nemours and Co., Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 24, 1983No. Civ. A. 76-407, 77-48PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
I. Introduction
In November of 1976, plaintiff Sara L. Ferguson 1 commenced a sex discrimination action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 2 (“Title VII”) against defendant E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company, Inc. (“Du Pont”). 3 Basically, plaintiff claimed violations of Title VII based upon the following four theories: first, denial of promotion due to intentional sexual discrimination; second, wage discrimination; third, sexual harassment; 4 and fourth, retaliation. The Court has jurisdiction over these claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Linda M. Kocsis v. Multi-Care Management, Inc., D/B/A Bath Manor Special Care CentreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Sheila White, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Charlotte Lynn Rawlins YATES and Cheryl Jenkins Mathis, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AVCO CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Collins v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.