Legal Opinion

Office Planning Group, Inc v. Baraga-Houghton-Keweenaw Child Development Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 2005No. Docket 125448Published

1Opinion of the Court

697 N.W.2d 871 (2005)

472 Mich. 479

OFFICE PLANNING GROUP, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellee,

v.

BARAGA-HOUGHTON-KEWEENAW CHILD DEVELOPMENT BOARD, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 125448. COA No. 6.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued November 10, 2004.

Decided June 8, 2005.

Tercha & Daavettila, PLLC (by Robert T. Daavettila), Houghton, MI, for the plaintiff.

Johnson, Rosati, LaBarge, Aseltyne & Field, P.C. (by Marcia L. Howe), Farmington Hills, MI, for the defendant.

YOUNG, J.

Plaintiff is a disappointed bidder that seeks disclosure from defendant of bid documents under 42 U.S.C. 9839(a), a provision of the…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API