Reeves v. Mayflower Transit, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARROLL, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court for consideration of plaintiffs motion to remand filed January 14, 1999. The parties have filed submissions on the motion and the matter is ready for resolution. For the reasons stated below, the court finds that the motion is due to be denied.
I
This action relates to a moving agreement between the parties. Plaintiffs, Walter and Carlanda Reeves contracted with defendants Mayflower Transit Inc., AAA Associates Moving & Storage, Fred A. Russell, Kachina Moving & Storage, Inc. and TransProtection Service Co., to pack,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hughes Aircraft Company National Union Fire Insurance Company v. North American Van Lines, Inc., and Does 1-100, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hoskins v. Bekins Van LinesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Frank H. Smith v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Bear MGC Cutlery Co. v. Estes Express Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2001
- Lamm v. Bekins Van Lines Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
- Ivana Vidovic Mlinar v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.